Posts

INTERESTING CASE OF GEORGE WYTHE, THE FIRST LAW PROFESSOR OF THE USA

Image
Interesting case of 
George Wythe, the first law professor of the US

Originally shared by VAL-U-PRO CONSULTING GROUP, LLC -  SRIKANTH KIDAMBI in CONSUMER GOOGLE+, 
WHEN IT WAS STILL ALIVE

(Please share your comments on the article, 
and also help us select the more appropriate picture from the two choices above for this article)
Father's Day Wisdom Story revolves around Prof. George Wythe.


- Professor George Wythe, First Professor of Law in USA
- Practised law with the motto: "Secundis dubiisque rectus", means "Upright in prosperity and perils."
- Mentored and/or Taught many greats of those years as perceived by others with Thomas Jefferson being one of his best students.
- Mr. Wythe's unequivocal statement shared below was one of the first instances when there was a mention of the power vested on court to hold a legislative act unconstitutional:
"Nay more, if the whole legislature, an event to be deprecated, should attempt to overleap the bounds prescribed by the…

FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY & SPAM BOMBING - PART II

Image
PART I -> Available over here -
FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY AND SPAM BOMBING - PART I

This was the charge that showed up all of a sudden while our founder was on an international trip. 




What is this APMEX, INC.,?

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APMEX
What is unusual about this transaction? Usually, most of the credit card issuers verify international transactions prior to completing the transactions. There were several times in the past when our founder could not get the first transaction through while on international trips and had to confirm the authenticity of that transaction prior to repeating the same transaction.  Unlike those experiences, this transaction went through first prior to getting the above message. For that matter, our founder had made another transaction later on while on the same trip through another type of credit card, and that particular credit card issuer sent an email requesting for confirmation prior to approving the transaction. Taking this step would have preven…

FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY & SPAM BOMBING - PART I

Image
PART II -> Available over here -
FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY AND SPAM BOMBING - PART II

What is Email bombing or Spam bombing? Why are we bringing up this topic in this article? How bad elements exploit this technique to create havoc and confusion?
Spam bombing or email bombing is the method used by bad elements to bombard one's inbox by sending massive number of emails. For example, please see below are images showing how the inbox was flooded with spam emails that numbered to as many as 100+ emails in a short period of time. If not for the timely and immediate action, there would have been even more spam emails. Usually, such bombardment also happens almost at the same time when there tends to be fraudulent charge on the credit card, as was the case with this real example.

Before we jump further into this topic of spam bombing and its relevance to our own experience in the recent times, we would like to share an interesting story whether our search for the topic of spam bombing that incl…

i(eye) Quote: BRAIN & EIGHT LEGGED FREAKS

Image
Photo credit: zaldy icaonapo

“Research points out that the human brain is approximately 2% at most of human body weight, but consumes 20% of oxygen and 20-25% of energy through glucose metabolism.
That is why I wrote years back on our media site, srikanthkidambi.com, stealing ideas blatantly is like eight-legged freaks feeding on to human brains as seen in the funny horror comedy, Eight Legged Freaks, that came out in the year 2002." - Dr Srikanth Srinivasan Kidambi


Originally posted in Life hacking quotes and Analytics Pie

Quote - Dr Srikanth Srinivasan Kidambi


TRADEMARKS, STARE DECISIS, RULE OF LAW & LAYERED APPROACH

Image
Stare decisis and Rule of Law - Looking at the layered approach presented earlier - What it means and how it is relevant in making proper legal decisions?

1. Principle of Constancy 2. Principle of Generality 3. Principle of Institutional Responsibility 4. Principle of Legal Fidelity

To be cont'd soon ..

IMESSAGE & EYE-PERSONAL Story: SHOULD IT BE A TRADEMARK IN THE FIRST PLACE? WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Image
Photo Credit: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cd/Registered_trademark_symbol.png

Evidence 1: 

Apple contested our application that was in Google's play store directly with Google, who joined hands to remove our iMessenger/IMESSENGER app from the Google Play Store. As per Apple's legal counsel, they believed that iMessenger would cause likelihood of confusion with Apple's iMessage, though iMessage is an iOS based application, whereas ours was an android based application.

Additionally, IMESSENGER trademark was approved not once, but twice by the USPTO and was the first one in this series dating back to 1999 before other trademarks such as AOL messenger and Instant Messenger came out. Finally after more than a decade, Apple's iMessage was registered. Going by the argument meted out by Apple's legal counsel, it makes us wonder whether iMessage should be a trademark in the first place going by their own legal counsel's argument? What do you think?

Tabl…

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE: IMESSAGE application is specific for iOS systems

Image
This is the message suggesting to turn off iMessage on non-Apple phones supporting iMessage application is confined to iOS systems.

Reference:
https://selfsolve.apple.com/deregister-imessage/

IMESSENGER TRADEMARK STORY V (Cont'd)

Image
Continuation of this real story -

Where are we now?

We just submitted our response letter to the non-office action to USPTO. As this information is publicly available, we are sharing the same on this legal knowledge exchange capital/commission (LKEC).
This response letter is in addition to what was already shared with Mr David Collier in an email format and during a phone conversation. These communications with Mr David Collierthrough emails and a phone conversation happened right after we received an office action letter and email from the USPTO office on August 12, 2019. In addition to those communications, we would like to present a detailed response for concerns presented in the office action letter.







I. Section 2(d) – Likelihood of Confusion Refusal Office Action Content:

The applicant argues that the cited registrations co-existed with now dead Registration Numbers 2356273 and 3348418.  Although that may be the case, prior decisions and actions of other trademark examining attorneys i…